In praise of blurry images.

Sometimes I choose to post a blurry image.

Admittedly, most of the time it has been generated as a result of user (me!) error.  Occasionally, I’ve planned it.  Regardless of how it’s arrived at, there is something about it that has caught my eye.  Invariably, somebody will condemn it by pointing out the obvious: “it’s blurry”.  End of story.

Or is it?

Sometimes, the out-of-focus-ness is adding more than it’s taking away.

Sometimes, the emotive intent of an image is made sharper precisely because it is blurry.

You’ll find some samples below.  They’re all blurry — and they all have left an indelible impression on my mind.

[And you?... do you have a favourite blurry image?  I'd love to see it...]

—Peter.

(please click on the images below to view)

↑Nikon D3S and Nikkor-NOCT 58mm @ f/1.2.

↑Leica M9 and Leica 50mm Summilux ASPH @ f/1.4.

↑Nikon D3S and Nikkor-NOCT 58mm @ f/1.2.

↑Leica M9 and Konica Hexanon 60mm @ f/1.2.

↑Leica M9 and Leica 35mm Summilux FLE @ f/1.4.

10 thoughts on “In praise of blurry images.

  1. Mark says:

    …love #4 on the beach. Amazing colors!!

    On a side note: how often do you find yourself shooting with your D3S?

    M.

    • Prosophos says:

      Thanks Mark!

      In answer to your question, I sold my D3S last year and have shot exclusively with my M9… every so often, I process an old D3S file and post it.

  2. agplatt says:

    Good topic. Nice to read you come out and state this so clearly.

  3. So, blurry photos aside, which I enjoy whether intentional or serendipitous (I have the odd one of those), do you ever put a roll of film through an old body at all these days? The M9 is such a capable and useable camera that I happily sold my 1Ds3, but I still have a regular ‘need’ to expose film.

    Mike

    • Prosophos says:

      Mike! Yes, I’ve been working on a 36 roll of Tri-X for the last three months… haven’t used it up yet, but yes, I’ll develop and scan it when it’s done….

      • Nice to know you haven’t abandoned film, but I have a similar modus operandi – the volume of film depnds on the volume of time available for developing/scanning.

        Look forward to seeing some scans.

        Mike

  4. greg g49 says:

    I dunno, at 63, blurry is what I seem to do most of… ;-)

  5. henrik lindegaard, denmark says:

    I agree with you on your statement that blur sometimes adds more than it removes. Especially after having added a Summilux 50mm to my M9 (which is hard/impossible to focus close up), I’ve found it good to argue in favor blur-is-better. :-)

    But I cannot see what blur adds to #2 (but that’s just me), and I don’t think #5 is blurred (I’m sure you intended to focus on the snow). #3-#5 are my favorites. They’re fantastic.

    By the way – enjoyed your M9/M3 sports shots.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 516 other followers

%d bloggers like this: